Mastodon

jurisprudent

what's fair to expect of someone ruling on the law?

jurisprudent
An image of the US Supreme Court interior, with the shiny black chairs, the wooden bench at which they all sit, the four ionic columns of marble behind, with a red curtain with gold trim behind them, a clock, etc. Fancy, imposing.

On Monday, we looked at Deuteronomy 16:17-20 again–these verses really are important, and, in my opinion, do merit all this focus. So before we close out this section, I want to look at one more dimension of it. (We'll get to the As of the Ask the Rabbi(s) Q and As next week; I just wanted to finish this unit up, first.)

So, for the last time:

Judges (shoftim) and officers (shotrim) you shall appoint for your tribes, in all your gates which God your God gives you, and they shall judge the people with a just law. Do not pervert the law....Justice, justice shall you pursue, [etc, etc.] (Deuteronomy 16:17-20)

We've looked at the last verse, and we've looked at some texts on the officers, so today, let's have a look at some texts on judges and judging.

I don't know about you, but, among many other things, I really do find it illuminating to have this whole other set of texts and traditions constantly challenging my assumptions about the culture and society in which I currently live.

What is is not what must be.

I won't, with every text and commentary here, say, "Wow, now think about how things are, how things work in our systems today," but it's an implied contrast, yes? Yes.

Let's start with the Talmud.

Comments

Sign in or become a Life is a Sacred Text member to read and leave comments.

[quote="jtraverso, post:3, topic:41155"] ``` ``` [/quote] {{!--
If you want to embed comments, this is a good place to do it!
--}} {{/post}}