The Antisemitism Post (tm)
Gotta get the history to know where the tropes live in the discourse today.
This is Life as a Sacred Text đ±, an everybody-celebrating, justice-centered voyage into ancient stories that can illuminate our own lives. Itâs run on a nonprofit, so itâs 100% NAZI FREE. More about the project here, and to subscribe for FREE (or to support this labor) go here:
This is a framework meant to illuminate the longstanding tropes of antisemitism in order to see where they are alive in our discourse today. As I say further down, there are absolutely legitimate critiques of the Israeli government to be made (and I make them, early and often), but being able to separate out political conversation from harmful anti-Jewish tropes is essential. None of this is about diminishing or sidestepping the atrocities experienced by the Palestinian people; for some (but hardly all) of what I've written since 10/7, you can look here, here, here, here, here, here.
So.
Usually, when we talk about coded antisemitism, it looks something like this:
This is a bit from the sitcom 30 Rock (may its memory be for a blessing and episodes streamable forever) and itâs a jokeâright?? But why is it funny? And⊠why is this a joke in the first place? How did this come to be a joke one might tell on prime time network TV in 2006?
This post will talk about this, and a whole lot more.
But in order to do this, we need to go alllllll the way back, first.
A little timeline refresh!
- 63 BCE Rome conquers Judea. (The Hasmoneans/Maccabees werenât the best at running things.) Early Rabbinic Judaism has likely already begun developing.
- 4 BCE Jesus of Nazareth is born, approximately, according to scholars today.
- 30 CE Jesus is believed to have been crucified.
The process of Judaism and Christianity taking independent paths took a while. At first, Christianity was just another offshoot of Judaismâ kind of.
48-50 CE The Council of Jerusalem: Paul, Barnabas James âthe Just,â Peter and John conclude that, in fact, non-Jews do not require circumcision (and observance of other mitzvot) in order to convert to Christianity.
66 CE Tensions between the Jews and the Romans finally explode in the form of the Great Jewish Revolt. The Jews try to rise up against the Roman Empire. It⊠does not go as hoped.
- 70 CE Rome destroys the Second Temple as part of quashing/retaliating against said revolt.
Rabbinic Judaismâs ritual observance outside the Temple system anchors Judaism in the wake of this catastrophe. Judaism lives on.
- 66-110 CE The four canonical Gospels are written.
- 132-135 CE The Bar Kochba Revolt was a last stand attempt by the Jews to get the Romans out of Judea. It ends badly. The Romans kill, enslave, and/or exile much of Judea. Jewish diaspora begins in earnest. (1)
I would like you to imagine how you tell a story about your ex during or after a complicated breakup vs. how things were when you were together and everything was great. I would like to invite you to consider the Jewishness of Jesus, and the portrayal of Jews in the Gospels, through that possible lens. (2)
Then the timeline hits a key date:
- 312 CE The Roman emperor Constantine converts to Christianity.
It is difficult to overstate the importance of this, I think?
Constantineâs conversion didnât just Christianize Europe (though it did that, obviously.) Suddenly, with a Christian Roman Empire, it was even less convenient to have a narrative in which... the Roman Empire was responsible for Jesusâ death.
Well, gosh. Who could we blame instead???
đ*jazz hands*đ
This became a Whole Thing for a Long Time. For example, antisemitic Passion Playsâtheatrical depictions of the end of the life of, crucifixion, and resurrection of Jesusâwere very popular around Easter, and the Jew-blaming in these dramas would be very effective for fomenting anti-Jewish sentimentâwhich, coupled with Holy Week liturgy sermons that often did the same, meant that Good Friday, like Christmas, tended to be a big time for pogroms.
The Middle Ages Were Bad.
The Crusades engendered the mass murder of Jewsâhorrific pogroms that kicked off with the First Crusades, as French and German locals and knights slaughtered about 10,000 Jews in the Rhineland in 1096âentire communities.
Jews began to be accused of the murder of Christian children, known as blood libels. The earliest was in Norwich, England in 1144.*
Jews were blamed for the Black Death in the 14th c., leading to widespread massacres, including entire communities being burned alive; about 510 Jewish communities were destroyed in this period.
Jews were required to wear a special distinctive, identifying star, badge or hat in many places across Europe, from 1215-to 18th/19th c.
WORLD JEWRY INTERLUDE
(The antisemitic trope still in effect today was born in Europeâwhich is why we're looking there todayâbut it's important to remember that Jews are from all over the place, look like every kind of people, and have cultures and histories that're equally diverse.)
About 15% of US Jewry are Jews of Color (which includes some but not all Sephardi or Mizrahi Jews, and also includes Ashkenazi Jews. And that stat includes Jews from all over this map, including Jews whose families are as ancient as they go, Jews from mixed families, Jews by choice or descendants of Jews by choice, and Jews who are Jews by any number of other paths.)
Historian Avi Shlaim was born in Baghdad, raised in Israel and has spent the majority of his adult life in England:
But, again, the trope of antisemitism that is in play today was born in Europe, so thatâs why weâre looking there:
So back to medieval Europe:
As so often happens with things like these, anti-Jewish oppression created anti-Jewish stereotypes.
- Jews couldnât own land in much of Europe, and were also locked out of most trade guilds.
- Jews had to pay special high taxes across Europe, so communities needed real đ° for survival.
- Lending money with interest was forbidden in Catholicism. Local authorities found it⊠convenient⊠to push Jews into work seen as morally repugnant. And banking was kinda (đ€·) in Judaism. Frankly, we didn't have much choice:
"If we nowadays allow interest to be taken from non-Jews, it is because there is no end to the yoke and the burden king and ministers impose on us, and everything we take is the minimum for our subsistence, and anyhow we are condemned to live in the midst of the other nations and cannot earn our living in any other manner except by money dealings with them; therefore the taking of interest is not to be prohibited." (Tosafot to Talmud Bava Metzia 70b. 11th-13th c. France/Germany)
- So Jews lent money, collected rents, engaged in trade, and did other kinds of urban work from the ghettos in which they were forced to live, often whatever work they could pull together.
Even though a small subset of Jews engaged in moneylending, and were pushed into it for economic survival, Jews were stereotyped as greedy, blood-sucking usurers. And sometimes Christians would confuse their contemporary neighbors with the moneychangers described in the Gospels whom Jesus chased away from the Temple.*
*Never mind that the issue in the Gospel stories was not that they were Jews who helped pilgrims change to the local currency, but that they were people who happened to be cheaters.
And so the dynamic began. It was all too easy.
Whenever things went down, people in power had a ready scapegoat there.
An ethnic/religious/racial other* who is despised both forâas the story goesâkilling Jesus, and for being increasingly connected to greed, money, sin. (3)
Something goes wrong? (4)
Those in charge could cry:
Blame the Jews, not me!
Jewish Studies scholar Mika Ahuvia notes,
âEconomists have correlated ⊠expulsions with times of economic downturn, because of poor weather conditions, corruption, or plagues. Whenever things were going badly and leaders needed a scapegoat, it was useful for them to blame and expel Jews from their cities as a way of âtaking action.ââ
At the end of the 19th c., as anti-Czar sentiment was fomentingâyep, people mad at the ruling partyâ so the Russian Czarâs Secret Service created the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
It was the same trope, but now they ratcheted things up a notch.
Now we're talking about a secret global cabal.
This was antisemitic propaganda (blame the Jews, not the Czar!) about a secret ring of Jews who were plotting to rule the world by manipulating the economy, controlling the media, and fostering religious conflict, all behind the scenes.
This is the prototype for a key antisemitic trope today.
The Czar: the gift that keeps on giving.
In the 1920âs, Henry Ford got his hands on an English translation of Protocols and spread it, and many other antisemitic lies, throughout the US via his paper, The Dearborn Independent.
How can antisemitism seem so invisible?
âPartly itâs that it allows Jews success. Many oppressions rely on keeping a targeted group of people poor, uneducated, designated non-white, or otherwise âat the bottom.â Anti-Jewish oppression doesnât depend on that. Although at many times it has kept Jews in poverty or designated non-white, these have been âoptionalâ features. Because the point of anti-Jewish oppression is to keep a Jewish face in front, so that Jews, instead of ruling classes, become the target for peoplesâ rage, it works even more smoothly when Jews are allowed some success and can be perceived as the ones âin chargeâ by other oppressed groups.â âApril Rosenblum, The Past Didnât Go Anywhere (2007)
And so a trope is born:
⊠and continues, insidiouslyâŠ
Whenever you see antisemitic harm you have to remember to remind yourself: "Jews, instead of ruling classes, become the target for peoplesâ rage," as Rosenblum said.
Am I looking at the rage of "people," or "ruling classes"?
How much social or positional power does the person in question have? How strategic is their antisemitism, vs. speaking from a place of ignorance? What's the function of this harm, and, as such, what will be my choice in how I respond to it?
The brilliant Eric Ward, an expert on authoritarian movements, wrote an iconic piece called "Skin in the Game: How Antisemitism Animates White Nationalism.â In it, he articulated a key issue:
The successes of the civil rights movement created a terrible problem for White supremacist ideology. White supremacismâinscribed de jure by the Jim Crow regime and upheld de facto outside the Southâhad been the law of the land, and a Black-led social movement had toppled the political regime that supported it. How could a race of [ostensible] inferiors have unseated this power structure through organizing alone? For that matter, how could feminists and LGBTQ people have upended traditional gender relations...? How do you explain the election of a Black president? Some secret cabal, some mythological power, must be manipulating the social order behind the scenes. This diabolical evil must control television, banking, entertainment, education, and even Washington, D.C.â â Eric Ward, âSkin in the Game: How Antisemitism Animates White Nationalismâ
Rothchild? Soros? Same as its ever been, even as the narrative evolves (to be even more insulting to those leading their own justice movements):
Part of the power of antisemitism is in the ways that it is not named directly.
This both allows for plausible deniability, as well as mutabilityâwhich is how Jews wind up held responsible for both communism and capitalism, often simultaneously. For example, one hears about:
- New York Values
- The Deep State
- Globalists
- Financiers
- International bankers
- Cosmopolitans (rootless, sometimes)
- Coastal liberals
- The Lizard People
- Cultural Marxists
- The Cabal
- Intelligentsia
- Media elites
- Illuminati
- The people running Hollywood
- ((( )))
- Woke Ivory tower types
... yeahh...
So, to revisit that 30 Rock joke.
White Jews and Conditional Whiteness: Some History and Context:
- When (white, primarily Ashkenazi) Jews got to the U.S., we were coded as racially âotherâ initially. There was both systemic discrimination and bias; antiblack "racial covenants" in housing often also barred Jews; Jews were discriminated against in employment; in tightened quotas on enrollment and teaching in colleges and universities. Restaurants, hotels and other establishments barred Jews from entry.
- This changed with the G.I. Bill, which offered significant financial benefits and educational opportunities for returning WWII veterans. Jews benefited from it in a way that Black veterans did not, as Jim Crow laws, redlining, discrimination in education, and other structural barriers continued to exist for Black Americans.
- The US social framework of whiteness began to expand to include white-skinned Jews at this time, and Jews began to reap the structural benefits of whiteness.
- This intensified after the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbade discrimination against âcreedâ as well as against race.
- White supremacists do not see Jews as âwhiteâ and target Jews for their Jewishness, and/though white Jews today reap profound benefits of whiteness in an antiblack society; we enter spaces like the hospital, the school, and encounters with police as white, we have been able to accumulate inherited wealth since at least the G.I. Bill, and income injustice tips in our favor.
It is all both/and.
AlsoâŠ
- Jews who are marked more visibly as Jews by clothing, hair, etc. experience more anti-Jewish hatred.
- White privilege means that the option to change clothes, cover a yarmulke with or tuck sidelocks (peyos) into a baseball cap would change that. (And nobody should have to do this!) This is why we talk about conditional whiteness.
- Again, again, again: Some Jews are Black, Latine, Indigenous, Asian, Asian-American, Arab/Mizrahi, biracial, and more. Not all Jews are white, and not all Ashkenazi Jews are white. (About 15% of the American Jewish community is comprised of Jews of color.) So we must be inclusive in our language and thoughtful about the ways in which racism and antisemitism impact Jewish communities.
Conditional Whiteness:
The Israel Conversation.
(aka: This Post Is Not Primarily About This)
There is room for challenging conversation and debate around Israel; criticism of Israel and anti-Zionism are not inherently antisemitic.
It is also true that criticism of Israel is sometimes weaponized as a cover for antisemitic beliefs and actions.
Jews are often held to different standards than their non-Jewish counterparts with regards to their relationships to and opinions on Israel, particularly in spaces that do not involve work on Israel. Holding Jews to political standards not otherwise required for non-Jews, or demanding that they pass some sort of political litmus test is misinformed and damaging.
It's also important to remember that just as we thoughtfully separate the actions of the American government and systems from the beliefs of all Americans ("Oh, you're from the USâ that means you support the school-to-prison pipeline, obviously.")âthat, so, too, do we not implicate individual Israelis in the actions of their government, especially given that support for Bibi is at like 15% right now.
Last year, Public Religion Research Institute and the Brookings Institution found that more than half of Republicans believe the country should be a strictly Christian nation, either adhering to the ideals of Christian nationalism (21%) or sympathizing with those views (33%). The survey also found correlations between people who hold Christian nationalist views as well as those that are patriarchal, antiBlack, anti-im/migrant, anti-Muslim, and antisemitic. (5) Hopefully it doesn't need to be spelled out how this agenda is being enacted in real life, on real people's bodies.
Solidarity is the only way home â for all of us.
It's the only way home here, in the US, where Christian nationalism is on the rise and we must all work together to safeguard our collective access to democracy, freedom, human rights, civil rights, and a future that protects everyoneâ especially those most marginalized by the current oppressive systems.
It's the only way home in Israel/Palestine, where 14 million people have nowhere else to go, nowhere else they call home- and where only a shared political solution, a mutual commitment to justice, to liberation, to peace, and to repairing all that which can beâ and acknowledging the debt of that which cannotâ can lead to a more whole tomorrow.
We must all find our way together. And part of that work involves being able to see one another in our full humanity, beyond deeply ingrained stereotypes and baggage.
đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±đ±
Like this? Get more of it in your inbox every week. đ±
For free every Mondayâsign up at the âSubscribe nowâ button just below.
And if you become a paid subscriber, that's how you can get tools for deeper transformation, a community for doing the work, and support the labor that makes these Monday essays happen.
Please spread the word about Life is a Sacred Text! đ±Especially without Substack's built-in network, word-of-mouthâ forwarding emails, sharing on social media, etcâ matters more than ever. Thank you. đ â€ïžA note on the subscription model:
I want my work to be as accessible to as many people as possible, in as many ways as possible. That's why the Monday essays are free, and why we donate subscriptions to anyone for whom paying is a barrier to the House of Study posts.
I also believe people should be paid fairly for their work. Needless to say, these two values sometimes seem to be in conflict, but I do what I can to find a fair balance. I offer many resources for free, and charge for others. When you donate generously or pay at the top of our scale, that helps support the work I do, provides access for those who have fewer resources, pays for the infrastructure and the technical and practical support that it takes to do this, and helps us keep the work sustainable.
And as always, if you want in to the Thursday space but paying isn't for you now, just email support@lifeisasacredtext.com and we'll hook you up.
And if youâd like to underwrite one of these donated subscriptions, you can do so by signing up at one of the higher subscription points.
And if it resonated with you, please share this post.
Sending a big pile of blessings and goodness your way. đ
BONUS THINGS!
This forthcoming book! So good.
This talk by the incredible Dove Kent
And I hardly remember what I said (and can't stand watching myself to find out), but it was a conversation about antisemitism with the wonderful Dr. Simran Jeet Singh:
FOOTNOTES
[1] Jewish-Christian breakup circa-Bar Kochba era
[2] Jesus was a Jew
[3] Jews as ethnic/religious "other" in medieval Europe
[4] Something goes wrong in medieval Europe?
[^5] Christian nationalism!
During this time, the Jewish-Christian breakup is happening in earnest. Lots to say about this, but tl;dr Jesus-following Jews were probably just another Jewish group just running around Second Temple Judea for a while, there was a significant communal overlap between them and other Jews before and after the Destruction, all these bullet points lead to tensions rising, and probably the breakup was well and truly done by the Bar Kochba Revolt. â©ïž
And yes, we will 100% explore Jesus' Jewishness in a future post at some point. I have Thoughts and Theories and Opinions based on what I know from this side of the aisle, needless to say. â©ïž
Again, another day, we'll look at Jews and the concept of "peoplehood," conditional whiteness intersecting with race as a construct in Europe vs antiblackness in the US and etc. But yes, Jews were one, but not the only, major racial/ethnic "other" in Europe for a good chunk of the last couple of thousand years. â©ïž
In many parts of Europe, Jews were often arrested and held for ransom, executed on both real and trumped-up charges, and often eventually massacred or expelled as a way of forcibly cancelling debts.
[^5] Christian nationalism asserts that the U.S. is a Christian nation and that the country's laws should therefore be rooted in Christian values. â©ïž